Musk, the chief govt of Tesla and Twitter, was referred to as to testify on the third day of a three-week trial by which shareholders allege they suffered billions price of monetary hurt and steep losses from a false declare that he had financing to take Tesla off the general public markets.

Musk, a defendant within the lawsuit, took questions from a plaintiff’s lawyer for round a half-hour Friday. Showing in a go well with and black tie, he gave stern — at occasions slicing — solutions to legal professionals who sought to carry him chargeable for monetary damages over his “Funding secured” tweet in 2018.

Decide Edward M. Chen has already dominated the declare unfaithful.

However the case hinges on the extent to which the claims had been materials to subsequent market strikes, and the way a lot traders relied on Musk’s tweets in making the trades that misplaced them cash. If the jury finds Musk or Tesla — or each — liable then jurors should resolve on the defendants’ accountability for the losses. A number of present and former Tesla board members are additionally named within the lawsuit.

Musk’s testimony on Friday included biting criticism of quick sellers — those that successfully guess in opposition to the corporate’s inventory and hope to reap beneficial properties from a decline in Tesla’s share worth.

“A bunch of sharks on Wall Road needed Tesla to die very badly,” he stated. “I consider short-selling needs to be made unlawful. It’s a means for, for my part, unhealthy individuals on Wall Road to steal cash from traders. Not good.”

Musk on Friday stated he makes use of his Twitter feed for public disclosures and “memes,” and stated he finds it an efficient approach to talk about merchandise and reply questions from clients.

Musk tweeted on Aug. 7, 2018: “Am contemplating taking Tesla non-public at $420. Funding secured.” He adopted that with a subsequent tweet, additionally referenced in court docket paperwork, studying “Investor assist is confirmed. Solely purpose why this isn’t sure is that it’s contingent on a shareholder vote.”

Within the days after, Musk’s declare fell aside. Musk disclosed on Aug. 13, 2018, he had been in communication with the Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund over the potential of taking the corporate non-public at a worth that might worth the corporate at greater than $70 billion. However the put up was removed from definitive.

Tesla revealed a weblog put up from Musk on Aug. 24, 2018, saying he supposed to maintain Tesla public. “That stated, my perception that there’s greater than sufficient funding to take Tesla non-public was bolstered throughout this course of,” it learn.

The Securities and Change Fee sued Musk that September for allegedly mendacity to traders over the “Funding secured” declare. Musk and Tesla settled, finally paying $20 million fines every, and Musk agreed to step apart as Tesla board chairman.

Attorneys requested Musk about advisers urgent him to take a break from Twitter or cease tweeting across the time of his “Funding secured” tweet — after Musk had labeled a Thai cave rescue volunteer a “pedo man” on the positioning, resulting in a defamation lawsuit. Musk, represented by the identical lawyer now representing him within the federal shareholder lawsuit, was discovered not liable within the case.

Musk didn’t instantly recall the exchanges, however stated, “I continued to tweet, sure.”

In the course of the testimony, Musk recalled 2018 as an “extraordinarily painful and tough 12 months,” by which he slept within the Tesla manufacturing facility as he oversaw manufacturing of its Mannequin 3 sedan.

Musk has made repeated court docket appearances over the past a number of years concerning his management of Tesla, together with for a lawsuit associated to his compensation, in addition to in a case associated to the buyout of photo voltaic power firm SolarCity.

“I feel you’re a unhealthy human being,” Musk informed a plaintiffs lawyer within the SolarCity lawsuit.

On Wednesday, plaintiff and sophistication consultant Glen Littleton testified that he noticed “Funding secured” as the important thing declare in Musk’s statements, and extra context as subordinate to it. Littleton has stated he misplaced greater than $3.5 million on account of the matter.

However the class represents shareholders throughout the spectrum, together with lengthy and short-sellers, and huge and small-time traders.

One other witness, Timothy Fries, testified Friday that the “Funding secured” tweet value him $5,000.

“I felt that I misplaced cash on account of a misrepresentation,” he stated from the witness stand. “I hope to have my funds recovered, my losses recovered. … I wasn’t able to buy shares till I noticed the tweet.”

Musk has but to handle a lot of the substance of the case from the witness stand. The trial adjourned for the weekend earlier than the plaintiffs’ legal professionals completed questioning Musk. His testimony will proceed Monday.